Task Force Blog

Blog

Eurodad and the Need for Transparency in Europe

November 22, 2011

By Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy is a founder of the Tax Justice Network and director of Tax Research LLP. An expert on tax policy, he writes a daily blog which provides regular news on his activities and opinions at www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/

I was delighted to talk at the launch of Eurodad’s new report – ‘Exposing the lost billions: How financial transparency by multinationals on a country by country basis can aid development‘ – last evening in the European Parliament.

The report is on country-by-country reporting and is another major contribution to the debate now going on in Europe on this issue, and how far such reporting should go.

The EU has conceded the case for country-by-country reporting, but only so far with regard to the extractive industries and forestry, and only with regard to payments to be made to host countries by companies extracting such resources.

Don’t get me wrong: I welcome this disclosure, but it’s far short of what is needed. As the representative of the Commission speaking at the event conceded, at a time when a deficit of tax revenue is at the core of the crisis facing Europe to concentrate solely on how accounting may be used to tackle corruption, but not financial disclosure or even tax due in developing countries does seem to be an ambition remarkably short of that required.

I argued the case for country-by-country reporting that I make in summary here and highlighted three things. First, if the EU really believes in the free movement of capital then it has to believe that movement must be accountable – and only country-by-country reporting can do that.

Second, if it really believes, as it says it does, in a single market then it has to believe in the integration of EU corporate tax systems and country-by-country reporting is designed to help provide the data to make that integration work.

Third, if the EU thinks that markets deliver well-being (and there’s no doubt they help do so) then they must also believe that openness, transparency accountability are all essential to ensuring a proper allocation of resources within markets. Preserving the status quo where 60% of world trade is hidden from view, and much of it is routed through tax havens, by the combination of consolidated accounts and secrecy jurisdiction subsidiaries within multinational corporations does not demonstrate commitment to that ideal.

There’s a long way to go in this debate as yet, with every chance the Commission proposals can be extended to embrace full country-by-country reporting. I’m up for the fight to achieve just that.

Share

Disclaimer: Unless specifically stated to be the views of the Task Force, the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the individual blogger and are not necessarily those of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development.

Latest Press Releases

GFI’s Tom Cardamone to Testify before Senate Committee Regarding the Global Security Implications of Poaching

Global Financial Integrity · May 23, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) Managing Director Tom Cardamone will testify tomorrow before the full U.S. Senate Committee on ...

FTSE Giants Face Tough Questions on Tax and Financial Secrecy at AGMs This Year

Christian Aid · May 22, 2012

BRUSSELS - Tax is joining high pay as an issue at FTSE100 companies’ AGMs this year, with Boards facing tough questions about ...

GFI Calls on G8 to Tackle Illicit Financial Flows at Camp David Summit

Global Financial Integrity · May 17, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) today called on leaders of the G8 to concretely tackle the issue of illicit financial ...