Task Force Blog

Blog

Swiss Ambassador to India Speaks with Forked Tongue

August 3, 2011

By Nicholas Shaxson

Nicholas Shaxson, the editor of TJN's Tax Justice Focus and writer for the Tax Justice Network, is an associate fellow at Chatham House in London and the author of a book about tax havens, entitled Treasure Islands, launched in 2011.

From the Tax Justice Blog:

From India’s Tehelka, an interview with Philippe Welti, Switzerland’s ambassador to India, in a section where he talks about the origins of Swiss bank secrecy:

“The banks were comforted with the fact they could say no, we are under legal protection, we are threatened by punishment if we release data. That is the magic of Swiss banking secrecy and my job as an Ambassador, a representative of Swiss society is to remind the world that it risks turning into a dangerous place where the rule of law is abandoned.

The thinking behind it, and the moral value of such a policy of government and a parliament and a people behind is timeless. That’s why I defend it. Because we are talking about values, not commercial benefits.”

So let’s get this straight. Here is a country whose banking system has historically built itself up on the commercial benefits that flow from banking secrecy and from assisting criminal tax evasion, criminal money-laundering, harbouring the proceeds of criminal smuggling, criminal theft, criminal racketeering, criminal drugs-running, and on and on. And here is the Swiss ambassador talking piously about the rule of law, in the very same sentence as he talks about the magic of Swiss banking secrecy.

Now Welti asserts, correctly, that:

“we can order a bank to reveal its data for cases of illegal profit that qualify for the lifting of secrecy.”

That is not an untrue statement – but note that all-important word ‘can.’ Worldwide, this has only been applied in limited cases – notably when there is enough of a media storm about a particularly nefarious and well-known individual or criminal enterprise. But Switzerland continues to harbour oceans of dirty money. Elsewhere, in India’s Business Standard, Welti has asserted that:

“There is a prescribed procedure in a treaty with India to get information on illegal stashes in Swiss bank accounts, which hasn’t been used.

Q: Are you saying the Indian govt has so far filed not a single request before the Swiss govt?

Welti: I haven’t had to deal with one in my time.
. . .
Q: Several Indian agencies look into tax fraud & money laundering — Enforcement Directorate, CBI, Income Tax department. All these agencies have categorically said they have visited Switzerland, they have requested for data and information from Swiss banks but failed to get anything on people they suspect.

Welti: If such agencies have tried and were unsuccessful, I was not aware of that. “

Which kind of says it all.

Now there are a couple of wrinkles here. First, we have so far presented this as if the Indian government has been blameless in this entire episode, desperately trying to get at the information from Switzerland, and meeting a fortress-like Swiss response. It’s not so simple: there appears to be something of a battle underway in India, with the Indian Supreme Court in a sense confronting the Indian government: the Supreme Court seems to be keen to extract the information about so-called “black money,” while the government – which is the one that actually has to implement the information requests with Switzerland – has been rather more reluctant: it has apparently been rather uninterested in submitting information requests of the quality that the Swiss might respond to positively. It’s certainly a murky picture, but the basic facts remain that there is, without question, a large amount of very dirty Indian money in Swiss banks: not just the tax-evading stuff, but money that falls into Anti Money Laundering categories.

A second wrinkle concerns Welti himself. He is an ambassador, bound by his position to follow what his country requires him to say and do. What we are attacking here is not so much Welti himself – we don’t know what his own personal views are – but the arguments he, and by extension his country, are making.

Swiss banking secrecy has indeed been pierced – but only mildly so, and things are continuing to evolve. (See our recent Switzerland edition of Tax Justice Focus for more information.) But the basic business model of secrecy remains intact (and latest news is that Germany and the UK are about to help Switzerland entrench it.) It’s that old Catch-22 situation: you have to already know the information you are looking for, before you request it. Which is little better than a bad joke.

Whereas Switzerland is grudgingly giving some co-operation to powerful countries like the United States, it is far less accomodating to developing countries like India. (See our September 2010 article about the Swiss-India tax treaty, for more.) And note what this UBS banker, in an outbreak of frankness, said last year as changes were taking effect:

“The poor lady shuffled around in her chair quite a lot before answering rather sheepishly that technically, while banking secrecy was still enshrined in the Swiss constitution, there had been some recent re-interpretation of the language and its actual meaning. . . . In a roundabout way she explained that, in practice, much turned on where the client was from (ie don’t be a Yank) and that most clients (especially those from little countries) had nothing to be concerned about.”

That bit in bold is a neat twist on Leona Helmsley’s famous phrase that ‘tax is for the little people’: in this case, criminal tax evasion is for the big people in the little countries (which means that in those countries, tax is for the little people.)

In short, Welti’s statement about his role to tell people about “the magic of Swiss banking” is fundamentally, 180 degrees, at odds with his statements about not tolerating crime.

Criminal activity – notably but not only criminal tax evasion – will continue to go unpunished, courtesy of Swiss banks. Developing countries will continue to be looted, and the rule of law undermined, courtesy of Swiss banks. Philippe Welti, whatever his personal opinions may be, is speaking here with a forked tongue.

A global culture shift is now underway. One day, before too long we hope, people like Welti will be laughed (or perhaps chased) out of town when they say things like this.

Share

Disclaimer: Unless specifically stated to be the views of the Task Force, the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the individual blogger and are not necessarily those of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development.

  • Dev Kar

    Nick:

    I would strongly urge you to publish this blog in a major Indian newspaper.  This piece is one of the finest articles on Swiss banking obfuscation I have read in a long time and it deserves to be widely disseminated in India.  Please consider my suggestion seriously.

    Dev Kar 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/RKAKHM4FZZHYFIINDWUGVHP77U Jack

    Update . June 21st.. – 2012.

    The following sent to —-312 Lords.——- House of
    Lords.( inc. Lord Myners.)

    The following sent to —-649.M.P’s——–House of
    Commons.

    Full story plus
    all documentation sent to

    640.M.P’s ——- House of Commons.

    460.
    Lords.——-House Of Lords.

    BANK – PARTNERS IN CRIMES.

    Pictet & Cie Bank.

    Ivan Pictet.

    Nicolas Pictet.

    Charles Pictet.

    Jacques de Saussure.

    Jean – Francois Demole.

    Renaud de Planta.

    Philippe Bertherat..

    Pictet & Cie.- claim they are
    the “Rolls Royce”of Swiss banks.

    Swiss Banks or more
    correctly Swizz banks.

    Swizz. —- “ a great disappointment.” or a “ fraud.”

    Fraud. —“ an
    intentional deception or dishonesty.”— “a crime.”

    Crime. —“ an act
    committed or omitted in violation of a law.”

    Serious Crimes .

    Conspiring to pervert the
    Course of Justice.

    Perverting the Course of
    Justice.

    Contempt of Court.

    Pictet & Cie Bank –Partners –(1996—2012
    )- guilty.

    Peters &Peters –
    Partners.— (1999—2012 )- guilty.

    The bank and
    it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld crucial documents requested under
    a High Court order. The bank and it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld
    evidence from the Police, and one of it’s account managers Susan Broadhead gave a false witness statement .

    Another one of it’s managers Nicholas Campiche ( Now Head of Pictet
    – Alternative Investments.) concocted a letter pretending to be a client and
    closed his account. The senior partner (Ivan
    Pictet.) sought to have numerous
    documents destroyed,along with those copies held in their London office’s of Pictet Asset Management. Initially stating
    that they were forgeries then their lawyers Peters & Peters – Monty Raphael .Q.C.–and the barrister Charles Flint.Q.C. later had to admit
    in Court that the documents were genuine.

    British Parliament. Hansard .29th March 2007.

    Barry Sheerman .M.P.—quote.

    ———“ Constituents of mine have lost £2
    million through fraud. The fraudster used Pictet & Cie – - a French Bank -
    - and Pictet Asset Management to back the fraud being perpetrated.””

    (1) It is a criminal offence for a bank to
    knowingly act for an undischarged criminal bankrupt in so far as it seeks to
    assist that criminal bankrupt in the fraudulent movement of monies. ( Money
    Laundering.)

    (2)
    It is a criminal offence for a bank to lie to the police and the
    bankrupts trustee in bankruptcy in so far as any knowledge of, or dealings with
    the bank was refuted .

    (3)
    A bank can be guilty of Contempt of Court if it fails to comply fully
    with the Courts order for discovery .

    (4)
    The banks contempt is further compounded if it fails to address its
    error after it is specifically drawn to the to its solicitors attention. ( Monty Raphael Q.C.).

    (5)
    It is a criminal offence under the Financial Services Act to seek to
    destroy evidence that might be relevant to an investigation .

    (6)
    It is a criminal offence not to relinquish control of funds to the
    Trustee immediately the fact of the bankruptcy is drawn to the banks attention.

    (7)
    It is a criminal offence to lie or otherwise obfuscate the lawful and
    proper enquiries of the F.S.A.

    In the F.S.A.
    cover up , they concluded that there had been “ Rogue” elements in Pictet
    & Cie’s , London
    operations . They had been moved from their London Office so who was there left
    to prosecute. “ Unbelievable.”

    ** We thank –David Cameron.
    M.P. ( Canary Wharf Speech.)

    The
    Prime Minister.

    (1) Bankers who behave irresponsibly should
    face professional consequences.

    (2) If anyone is found to have behaved
    criminally they must be prosecuted.

    (3) The
    F.S.A and the Serious Fraud Office
    should be following up every lead, and

    investigating every suspect transaction .

    (4) We need to make it 100% clear –those
    who break the law should face prosecution.

    (5) That we make sure we root out any
    wrongdoing that may have happened, whoever is

    involved, however high or well connected they
    may be.

    The ‘Doyens’ of the establishment.’ ( Ivan Pictet and Monty Raphael.)

    Ivan Pictet.

    Managing partner in Pictet & Cie Bank
    . — retiring -. 2010.?

    President of the Geneva Financial Centre. – stepping
    down. 2010.?

    World Bank.committee member.

    United Nations. Investment Committee
    member,

    Vice President – Global Humanitarian
    Forum. — redundant.2010.?

    Member of the Henokiens.

    Blackstone Group — Board Member.

    Past- President – Geneva Private Bankers
    association.

    Past –President – Geneva Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

    Monty Raphael.Q.C. ( Peters & Peters.)

    Quote.” —-
    Doyen of U.K. Fraud lawyers.

    Head of Fraud and Regulatory Dept. — stepping down.?.

    Member of the Law Society of England & Wales.

    International Bar Association Member.

    Director of Fraud Advisory Panel.

    Written Parliamentary Questions received by the
    table office ..

    (1) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is
    taking to ensure that Swiss Banks such as Pictet & Cie do not evade
    criminal prosecution under EU law even when the illegal act is committed by a
    London based subsidiary.

    (2)To ask the secretary of state what steps he is
    taking to protect the rights of UK
    citizens who seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss banks with
    subsidiary offices located in London.

    We started our campaign in June 2008 — via the “net” to highlight
    our fight to get “justice”. . Again we thank other “ E- Mailers” for their
    information in relation to our campaign.

    Quote. ( America’s
    Top Lawyer .)

    You can be the richest man in the world
    with the best lawyers that money can buy but you cannot win against a man who
    has got nothing left to lose and is telling the truth.

    Truth Hurts.

    Ivan Pictet. Announces stepping down from Pictet & Cie. 5th
    Feb 2010.

    June 2010 – stepping down as president. Geneva. Financial Centre.

    Monty Raphael. Steps down as head .( Peters and Peters ) May.
    2009.

    ***
    We note that there has been a sharp increase in Peters & Peters
    partners leaving to go to other practices. Moving does not alleviate them of
    any responsibility from any illegalities that may have occurred at Peters &
    Peters during their partnership tenure. From 1999 onwards.

    ***
    Were currently waiting to see
    if the West Yorkshire Police :-

    (1)
    Chief Constable —- Sir
    Norman Bettison.

    (2)
    Forces Solicitor —-
    Mike Percival.

    (3)
    Head of Economic Crimes
    Unit.— Det. Chief Inspector Steven Taylor.

    – continue to attempt to cover this case up like
    their F.S.A. Counterparts.

    If they do “
    watch this space”)

    We have recently been informed that due to pressure
    from our M.P. that the Ministry of Justice had asked Lord Myners to investigate our claims
    that the F.S.A. covered up the illegal activities of Pictet Asset Management. London. They might as well
    have asked Ivan Pictet to investigate .or Friends Reunited.

    Lady Myners on Prix Pictet board.

    The consensus of opinion is the Pictet & Cie
    should be prosecuted , and that their
    banking licence’s should be taken
    away in the U.K.
    ( and fined.)

    Their solicitors at Peters & Peters — struck
    off and prosecuted..

    In America
    they would have all been in prison for the last seven years.

    WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE.

    We note that Det. Chief Inspector Steven Taylor has been removed as the
    Head of Economic Crime Unit and demoted to Det. Inspector. ( One down two to
    go).

    *** An official acting on behalf of the Secretary of
    State to investigate our complaint against West Yorkshire Police for
    withholding documentation from the creditors about assets/investments held in a
    Swiss Bank and hidden under “ non
    sensitive – unused material”. He unbelievably made an agreement/commitment with
    the West Yorkshire Police not to release to
    the creditors this information and instructed not to tell us of the agreement
    they had reached. ( Conspiring to Pervert the Course of Justice.)

    A file of some 339 pages including scores of
    documentation as been forwarded to the following –.

    640 — Members of Parliament.

    460 — Members of
    the House of Lords.

    Ministry of Justice

    F.S.A — Financial Services Authority

    Serious Fraud Office.

    Peters & Peters. London. — Solicitors.

    Pictet & Cie.
    Bank —- London
    & Geneva.

    West
    Yorkshire Police Authority.

    I.P.C.C. – Independent Police Complaints Commission.

    C.C.R.C.—Criminal
    Cases Review Commission.

    Swiss Ambassador
    London.

    .

    Started June 6 th 2008. ( almost 5
    million E-Mail in threeand half years.)

    Still no injunctions – - -no writs – - – ( they can’t go to Court
    - – - – it’s all true.)

    *** the Bigger they are – - – - the harder they fall.!!!

    In America – - they would have all been in prison for the
    last seven years.

    Full Story.

    Go on
    “Google”or “Yahoo.)

    Insert.— Charles Pictet. Banker.Insert.— Ivan Pictet. Banker.Insert.—Nicholas Pictet. Banker.Insert.—Jacques de Saussure. Banker.Insert.—Renaud De Planta. Banker.Insert.—Jean-Francoise Demole. Banker.Inser.— Philippe Bertherat. Banker.

    Or insert any
    of the following combinations.

    1.
    Insert.—( Jacques de Saussure/ Monty Raphael)

    2.
    Insert—( Ivan Pictet /
    Monty Raphael).

    3.
    Insert—( Sir Norman
    Bettison/ Det.Chief Steven Taylor.

    4.
    Insert—( Charles
    Flint/ Monty Raphael)

    5.
    Insert—( Nicholas
    Campiche/ Susan Broadhead). .

    6.
    Insert.—( F.S.A./ Monty
    Raphael.)

    7.
    Insert – ( F.S.A./
    Pictet & Cie.)

    8.
    Insert.—( Hansard/Ivan
    Pictet.)

    9.
    Insert. – ( Lord Myners
    / Pictet & Cie..)

    10. Insert – ( Sir Anthony Holland / Monty Raphael.)

    11. Insert – ( David Cameron / Monty Raphael.)

    12. Insert – ( Bernard Madoff / Pictet & Cie.)

    13. Insert – ( Sir Norman
    Bettison / Mike Percival.

    14. Insert – ( David Cameron /
    Pictet & Cie.)

    *** Latest News !.!.

    Bernard Madoff’s trustee suing Pictet & Cie. —
    $156 Million.

    Rogue Pictet & Cie advisors sold Madoff Funds.

    Pictet & Cie helped thousands of rich Americans
    hide monies offshore.

    Madoff got 150 years in jail —- surely the bank partners , their lawyers
    and “ advisors” should also get appropriate jail sentences.

    Aug.30th 2011— Pictet & Cie and its Partners being sued
    by Saudi Arabian Co for

    $350 Million —- Fraud and Money Laundering.

    May 6th .2012. — U.S. Authorities –
    Geneva Bank Pictet used offshore Tax Scheme.

    Then you can understand why people throughout the
    world are demonstrating about the corrupt practices of the banks and it’s
    partners and directors.

    *** They
    could go the same way as the oldest Swiss Bank — Wegelin . ( Closed down.)

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/RKAKHM4FZZHYFIINDWUGVHP77U Jack

    Peters
    &Peters – Partners.— (1999—2013)— guilty.

    Pictet
    & Cie Bank – Partners -(1996—2013) – guilty.

    The
    bank and it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld crucial
    documents requested under a High Court order. The bank and it’s
    officials/lawyers deliberately withheld evidence from the Police, and
    one of it’s account managers Susan
    Broadhead gave a false witness
    statement to the Police.

    Another one of it’s
    managers Nicholas Campiche
    ( Now Head of Pictet – Alternative Investments.) concocted a letter
    pretending to be a client and closed his account. The senior partner
    (Ivan Pictet.) sought
    to have numerous documents destroyed,along with those copies held in
    their London office’s of Pictet
    Asset Management. Initially
    stating that they were forgeries then their lawyers Peters
    & Peters – Monty Raphael Q.C.–and
    the barrister Charles Flint.Q.C.
    later had to admit in Court that
    the documents were genuine.

    British
    Parliament. Hansard .29th
    March 2007.

    Barry Sheerman
    .M.P.—quote.

    ———“
    Constituents of mine have lost
    £2 million through fraud. The fraudster used Pictet & Cie – - a
    French Bank – - and Pictet Asset Management to back the fraud being
    perpetrated.””

    (1) It is a criminal
    offence for a bank to knowingly act for an undischarged criminal
    bankrupt in so far as it seeks to assist that criminal bankrupt in
    the fraudulent movement of monies. ( Money Laundering.) assisted by
    Monty Raphael.Q.C.

    (2) It is a criminal
    offence for a bank to lie to the police and the bankrupts trustee in
    bankruptcy in so far as any knowledge of, or dealings with the bank
    was refuted . + Monty Raphael.Q.C.

    (3) A bank can be guilty
    of Contempt of Court if it fails to comply fully with the Courts
    order for discovery .+ Monty Raphael Q.C.

    (4) The banks
    contempt is further compounded if it fails to address its error after
    it is specifically drawn to the to its solicitors attention. ( Monty
    Raphael Q.C.).

    (5) It is a criminal
    offence under the Financial Services Act to seek to destroy evidence
    that might be relevant to an investigation .+ Monty Raphael.Q.C.

    (6) It is a criminal
    offence not to relinquish control of funds to the Trustee immediately
    the fact of the bankruptcy is drawn to the banks attention.+ Monty
    Raphael Q.C.

    (7) It is a criminal
    offence to lie or otherwise obfuscate the lawful and proper enquiries
    of the F.S.A. + Monty Raphael Q.C.

    In the F.S.A.
    cover up , they concluded that there had been “ Rogue”
    elements in Pictet & Cie’s , London operations . They had been
    moved from their London Office so who was there left to prosecute. “
    Unbelievable.”

    ***
    We thank –David
    Cameron. M.P. ( Canary Wharf Speech.)

    PRIME MINISTER.

    (1) Bankers who
    behave irresponsibly should face professional
    consequences.

    (2) If anyone is found to
    have behaved criminally they must be prosecuted.

    (3) The
    F.S.A and the Serious
    Fraud Office should be following
    up every lead,

    investigating every
    suspect transaction .

    (4) We need to make it
    100% clear –those who break the law should face

    prosecution.

    (5) That we make sure we
    root out any wrongdoing that may have happened, whoever

    is involved,
    however high or well connected they may be.

    Both Ivan Pictet
    and Monty Raphael.Q.C. conspired to withhold crucial documents
    requested by the High Court – the FSA — and the Police Serious
    Fraud Squad.

    Written
    Parliamentary Questions received by the table office ..

    (1) To ask the
    secretary of state what steps he is taking to ensure that Swiss Banks
    such as Pictet & Cie do not evade criminal prosecution under EU
    law even when the illegal act is committed by a London based
    subsidiary.

    (2)To ask the
    secretary of state what steps he is taking to protect the rights of
    UK citizens who seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss
    banks with subsidiary offices located in London.

    Quote.
    ( America’s Top Lawyer .)

    You can be
    the richest man in the world with the best lawyers that money can buy
    but you cannot win against a man who has got nothing left to lose and
    is telling the truth.

    *** We
    note that there has been a sharp increase in Peters & Peters
    partners leaving to go to other practices. Moving does not alleviate
    them of any responsibility from any illegalities that may have
    occurred at Peters & Peters during their partnership tenure. From
    1999 onwards.

    The consensus of
    opinion is the Pictet & Cie should be prosecuted , and that their
    U.K. banking licence should be taken away.

    Their Solicitors at
    Peters & Peters .London “ struck off and prosecuted..”

    *** Started
    campaign — June 6th.2008.

    4 .5years —-
    approx 8 .5 million e-mails – - – but still no writs, injunctions or
    threats of litigation – – - WHY – - – because it is all true.

    *** . The bigger
    they are — the harder they fall.!!!

    In
    America —- they would have all been in prison for the last seven
    years.

    Monty
    Raphael Q.C. — Master of the Bench — one of the main advisors to
    the F.S.A. — the Banks.— and the Police.

    Seeing
    that the Banks and the Police are now top of the criminality table
    and the F.S.A. top of the incompetency list for government bodies —
    we cannot understand why Monty Raphael Q.C. and his firm of Peters
    & Peters are still allowed to operate.( Friends in high places.)

    Monty
    And
    Friends
    In
    Association.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/RKAKHM4FZZHYFIINDWUGVHP77U Jack

    Update
    — Feb 13 .2013.

    Pictet
    & Cie Bank —- List of Crimes.

    1996 —–
    F.S.A— Breach in London.

    2003 —– F.S.A.
    – States rogues operating in Pictet’s London office. Ivan Pictet

    states
    that documents were forgeries but were later proved to be genuine in

    the
    British Courts. He had documents destroyed in their London office –

    hoping
    to hide the crimes.

    2007
    .- – - The Securities and Exchange Surveillance issued a
    recommendation

    that
    the Prime Minister and The Commissioner of the FSA to take
    disciplinary action against Pictet Asset Management – Japan Ltd.

    2008
    .– Dec. – Pictet Bank state – ” We have never chosen
    any funds linked to Madoff.

    2011 – - – Madoff
    Trustees sue Pictet & Cie. Bank for $156 Million.

    2011- – - Pictet &
    Cie Bank abetted a Bribery Scheme – Oil company sues Pictet for
    $350Million

    2012 – - – April
    – Geneva Bank Pictet used in Offshore Tax Scheme. ( USA.)

    2012 — – June.
    – Published in Anglo INFO .Geneva.— USA Trust Fund Investors were
    sent false and fraudulent documents by Pictet Bank in order to
    collect large fees. ( Like MADOFF)

    Even after the SEC
    in the USA uncovered the fraud Pictet continued to charge fees and
    drain whatever was left in these accounts. Estimated that $90 million
    lost in this Pictet Ponzi scheme.

    2012 – - – July.
    – De – Spiegel. — states – Pictet Bank uses a letterbox
    company in

    Panama
    and a tax loophole involving investments in London to gain

    German
    millionaires as clients.

    2012
    - – - August —- German Opposition Leader accuses Swiss Banks of
    “organised crime.”

    2013
    — Jan.— Swiss MP’ table motion to freeze Tiab Mahmud’s assets of
    ” criminal origins”

    held
    in Swiss banks – $18 million held in 5 accounts at Pictet &
    Cie. Bank. Bahamas.

    Ironically
    the Pictet & Cie.Bank partners are bigger criminals than the
    criminals who have accounts in the their bank.

    The
    bank is now seeking to re-structure — tocut the partners liability
    – hoping to off load their decades of criminal responsibilty –
    and move onwards to carry out new crimes. The Germans

    are
    right — the bankers should go to prison if found guilty of financial
    crimes..

    SWISS BANK PARTNERS IN
    CRIMES.

    Pictet
    & Cie Bank.

    Ivan
    Pictet.

    Charles
    Pictet.

    Nicolas
    Pictet.

    Jacques
    de Saussure.

    Jean
    – Francois Demole.

    Renaud
    de Planta.

    Philippe
    Bertherat..

    Pictet
    & Cie.-
    claim they are the “Rolls Royce”of Swiss banks.

    Swiss
    Banks or more correctly Swizz banks.

    Swizz.
    —- “ a great
    disappointment.” or a “ fraud.”

    Fraud.
    —“ an
    intentional deception or dishonesty.”— “a crime.”

    Crime.
    —“ an act
    committed or omitted in violation of a law.”

    Serious
    Crimes .

    Conspiring
    to pervert the Course of Justice.

    Perverting
    the Course of Justice.

    Contempt
    of Court.

    Pictet
    & Cie Bank –Partners –(1996—2013)—guilty

    Peters
    &Peters – Partners.— (1999—2013)— guilty.

    The
    bank and it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld crucial
    documents requested under a High Court order. The bank and it’s
    officials/lawyers deliberately withheld evidence from the Police, and
    one of it’s account managers Susan
    Broadhead gave a false witness
    statement to the Police.

    Another one of it’s
    managers Nicholas Campiche
    ( Now Head of Pictet – Alternative Investments.) concocted a letter
    pretending to be a client and closed his account. The senior partner
    (Ivan Pictet.) sought
    to have numerous documents destroyed,along with those copies held in
    their London office’s of Pictet
    Asset Management. Initially
    stating that they were forgeries then their lawyers Peters
    & Peters – Monty Raphael Q.C.–and
    the barrister Charles Flint.Q.C.
    later had to admit in Court that
    the documents were genuine.

    British
    Parliament. Hansard .29th
    March 2007.

    Barry Sheerman
    .M.P.—quote.

    ———“
    Constituents of mine have lost
    £2 million through fraud. The fraudster used Pictet & Cie – - a
    French Bank – - and Pictet Asset Management to back the fraud being
    perpetrated.””

    (1) It is a criminal
    offence for a bank to knowingly act for an undischarged criminal
    bankrupt in so far as it seeks to assist that criminal bankrupt in
    the fraudulent movement of monies. ( Money Laundering.)

    (2) It is a criminal
    offence for a bank to lie to the police and the bankrupts trustee in
    bankruptcy in so far as any knowledge of, or dealings with the bank
    was refuted .

    (3) A bank can be guilty
    of Contempt of Court if it fails to comply fully with the Courts
    order for discovery .

    (4) The banks
    contempt is further compounded if it fails to address its error after
    it is specifically drawn to the to its solicitors attention. ( Monty
    Raphael Q.C.).

    (5) It is a criminal
    offence under the Financial Services Act to seek to destroy evidence
    that might be relevant to an investigation .

    (6) It is a criminal
    offence not to relinquish control of funds to the Trustee immediately
    the fact of the bankruptcy is drawn to the banks attention.

    (7) It is a criminal
    offence to lie or otherwise obfuscate the lawful and proper enquiries
    of the F.S.A.

    In the F.S.A.
    cover up , they concluded that there had been “ Rogue”
    elements in Pictet & Cie’s , London operations . They had been
    moved from their London Office so who was there left to prosecute. “
    Unbelievable.”

    ***
    We thank –David
    Cameron. M.P. ( Canary Wharf Speech.)

    PRIME MINISTER.

    (1) Bankers who
    behave irresponsibly should face professional
    consequences.

    (2) If anyone is found to
    have behaved criminally they must be prosecuted.

    (3) The
    F.S.A and the Serious
    Fraud Office should be following
    up every lead,

    investigating every
    suspect transaction .

    (4) We need to make it
    100% clear –those who break the law should face

    prosecution.

    (5) That we make sure we
    root out any wrongdoing that may have happened, whoever

    is involved,
    however high or well connected they may be.

    Ivan
    Pictet.

    Managing partner in
    Pictet & Cie Bank .

    President of the
    Geneva Financial Centre.

    World Bank.committee
    member.

    United Nations.
    Investment Committee member,

    Vice President – Global
    Humanitarian Forum.

    Member of the Henokiens.

    Blackstone Group —
    Board Member.

    Past- President –
    Geneva Private Bankers association.

    Past –President –
    Geneva Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

    Monty
    Raphael.
    ( Peters & Peters.)

    Quote.”
    —- Doyen of U.K. Fraud lawyers.

    Head of Fraud and
    Regulatory Dept.
    Director of the Fraud Advisory
    panel.

    Member of the Law Society
    of England & Wales.

    International Bar
    Association Member.

    Both Ivan Pictet
    and Monty Raphael.Q.C. conspired to withhold crucial documents
    requested by the High Court – the FSA — and the Police Fraud
    Squad.

    Written
    Parliamentary Questions received by the table office ..

    (1) To ask the
    secretary of state what steps he is taking to ensure that Swiss Banks
    such as Pictet & Cie do not evade criminal prosecution under EU
    law even when the illegal act is committed by a London based
    subsidiary.

    (2)To ask the
    secretary of state what steps he is taking to protect the rights of
    UK citizens who seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss
    banks with subsidiary offices located in London.

    Quote.
    ( America’s Top Lawyer .)

    You can be
    the richest man in the world with the best lawyers that money can buy
    but you cannot win against a man who has got nothing left to lose and
    is telling the truth.

    *** We
    note that there has been a sharp increase in Peters & Peters
    partners leaving to go to other practices. Moving does not alleviate
    them of any responsibility from any illegalities that may have
    occurred at Peters & Peters during their partnership tenure. From
    1999 onwards.

    The consensus of
    opinion is the Pictet & Cie should be prosecuted , and that their
    U.K. banking licence should be taken away.

    Their Solicitors at
    Peters & Peters .London “ struck off and prosecuted..”

    *** Started
    campaign — June 6th.2008.

    4 .5years —-
    approx 8 .5 million e-mails – - – but still no writs, injunctions or
    threats of litigation – – - WHY – - – because it is all true.

    *** . The bigger
    they are — the harder they fall.!!!

    In
    America —- they would have all been in prison for the last seven
    years.

    Full
    Story.

    ” Google ”
    .

    Insert– ( Charles
    Pictet. Banker.

    Insert– ( Ivan
    Pictet.Banker.

    Insert– ( Jacques
    de Saussure.Banker.

    Insert– ( Nicolas
    Pictet. Banker.

    Insert– (
    Jean-Francois Demole.Banker.

    Insert — (
    Philippe Bertherat. Banker.

    Insert– ( Renaud
    de Planta. Banker.

    • jack loach

      Update —- May 18th 2013.

      Pictet & Cie Bank

      List of Crimes.

      1996 — F.S.A. — Breach in London.

      2003 — F.S.A. — States

      Rogues were operating in Pictet’s London offices.

      Ivan Pictet states that documents were forgeries but were later
      proved to be genuine in the British Courts. ( Ivan Pictet a proven liar.). He
      had documents destroyed in their London
      office – hoping to hide the crimes.

      2007 — The Securities&Exchange
      Surveillance ( Japan.)

      Issued a recommendation that the Prime Minister and the Commissioner
      of the F.S.A. to take disciplinary action against Pictet Asset Management –
      Japan Ltd.

      2008 — Dec. — Pictet Bank state – “ We have never chosen any
      funds linked to MADOFF.

      2011 – Madoff Trustees sue Pictet & Cie. Bank . for $156,000,000.
      ( They lied again.)

      2011 — Pictet & Cie
      bank abetted a Bribery Scheme. — Oil
      Company sues Pictet Bank for — $350,000,000.

      2012 — April.—Pictet & Cie, Bank .Geneva implicated in
      offshore Tax Scheme. –USA
      .

      2012 — June. — Published
      in Anglo INFO. Geneva, —- USA Trust Fund were sent false and fraudulent
      documents by Pictet Bank in order to collect large fees.

      (Like MADOFF). – Even after the SEC in the USA had
      uncovered the fraud Pictet Bank continued to charge fees and drain whatever was
      left in these accounts.

      Estimated that – $90,000,000 was lost in this Pictet Ponzi Scheme.

      2012 — July — German paper –De – Spiegel — states — Pictet Bank uses a letterbox
      company in Panama and a tax loophole involving investments in London to lure/gain
      German Millionaires as clients.

      2012 — August. — German
      Oppositon Leader accuses Swiss Banks of “ organised crime”.

      2013 — Swiss M.P.’s table
      motion to freeze Tiab Mahmuds assets of
      “ criminal origins” held in Swiss banks —
      $18,000,000 held in five accounts at Pictet & Cie Bank . Bahamas.

      2013 — Feb. — The bank is
      now seeking to re-structure — to cut the partners liability ( not to risk
      their ill gotten personal wealth.) —
      hoping to offload the decades of criminal responsibility. ( Some listed above.)

      The Germans are right – the bankers should go to prison if found
      guilty of financial crimes. ( Madoff got
      150 years in prison — surely the Pictet Bank’s partners should go to jail.)

      Ironically the Pictet & Cie .Bank partners are bigger criminals
      than the criminals who have accounts in their bank.

      _ _ _ _
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

      Pictet & Cie Bank.— Partners
      —– ( 1996—2013)—Guilty.

      Peters & Peters — Partners —— (1996 — 2013) —Guilty.

      The bank and it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld crucial
      documents requested under a High Court Order. The bank and it’s
      officials/lawyers deliberately held evidence from the police/courts.

      One of Pictet’s accounts managers SUSAN BROADHEAD gave a false
      witness statement to the police. The banks Head of Alternative Investments
      concocted a letter pretending to be a client and closed his account.

      The senior partner ( IVAN PICTET) sought to have numerous documents
      destroyed along with copies held in their London
      Office’s of Pictet Asset Management. Initially stating that they were
      forgeries.

      Their lawyers PETERS & PETERS —– re MONTY RAPHAEL.Q.C. and
      the barrister CHARLES FLINT. Q.C. later had to admit in Court that the
      documents were indeed genuine.

      British Parliament. Hansard.

      Barry Sheerman .M.P. — quote:

      “ Constituents of mine have lost £2,000,000. through fraud. The
      fraudster used Pictet & Cie – a French Bank – and Pictet Asset Management
      to back the fraud being perpetrated”.

      Both Ivan Pictet and Monty Raphael Q.C. conspired to withhold
      crucial documents requested by the High Court —- the F.S.A —– and the
      Police Fraud Squad.

      Written Parliamentary Questions received by the table office.

      (1) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to ensure
      that Swiss Banks such as Pictet & Cie do not evade criminal prosecution
      under EU law even when the illegal act is committed by a London based
      subsidiary.

      (2) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking mto
      protect the rights of UK citizens
      who seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss banks with subsidiary
      offices located in London.

      – - -
      - – - – - – - – - – - – .

      The consensus of opinion is that Pictet & Cie bank should be
      prosecuted, and that their U.K.
      Banking licence should be taken away.

      Their Solicitors at Peters & Peters.London. – “ Struck off and
      prosecuted.

      In America
      They would have all been in prison for the last seven years.

      Full Story. —– Google or
      Yahoo.

      Ivan Pictet. Banker.

      Charles Pictet. Banker.

      Nicolas Pictet. Banker.

      Renaud de Plant. Banker.

      Francois DeMole. Banker.

      Jacques de Saussure. Banker.

      Philippe Bertherat. Banker.

    • jack loach

      Update —- May 18th 2013.

      Pictet & Cie Bank

      List of Crimes.

      1996 — F.S.A. — Breach in London.

      2003 — F.S.A. — States

      Rogues were operating in Pictet’s London offices.

      Ivan Pictet states that documents were forgeries but were later
      proved to be genuine in the British Courts. ( Ivan Pictet a proven liar.). He
      had documents destroyed in their London
      office – hoping to hide the crimes.

      2007 — The Securities&Exchange
      Surveillance ( Japan.)

      Issued a recommendation that the Prime Minister and the Commissioner
      of the F.S.A. to take disciplinary action against Pictet Asset Management –
      Japan Ltd.

      2008 — Dec. — Pictet Bank state – “ We have never chosen any
      funds linked to MADOFF.

      2011 – Madoff Trustees sue Pictet & Cie. Bank . for $156,000,000.
      ( They lied again.)

      2011 — Pictet & Cie
      bank abetted a Bribery Scheme. — Oil
      Company sues Pictet Bank for — $350,000,000.

      2012 — April.—Pictet & Cie, Bank .Geneva implicated in
      offshore Tax Scheme. –USA
      .

      2012 — June. — Published
      in Anglo INFO. Geneva, —- USA Trust Fund were sent false and fraudulent
      documents by Pictet Bank in order to collect large fees.

      (Like MADOFF). – Even after the SEC in the USA had
      uncovered the fraud Pictet Bank continued to charge fees and drain whatever was
      left in these accounts.

      Estimated that – $90,000,000 was lost in this Pictet Ponzi Scheme.

      2012 — July — German paper –De – Spiegel — states — Pictet Bank uses a letterbox
      company in Panama and a tax loophole involving investments in London to lure/gain
      German Millionaires as clients.

      2012 — August. — German
      Oppositon Leader accuses Swiss Banks of “ organised crime”.

      2013 — Swiss M.P.’s table
      motion to freeze Tiab Mahmuds assets of
      “ criminal origins” held in Swiss banks —
      $18,000,000 held in five accounts at Pictet & Cie Bank . Bahamas.

      2013 — Feb. — The bank is
      now seeking to re-structure — to cut the partners liability ( not to risk
      their ill gotten personal wealth.) —
      hoping to offload the decades of criminal responsibility. ( Some listed above.)

      The Germans are right – the bankers should go to prison if found
      guilty of financial crimes. ( Madoff got
      150 years in prison — surely the Pictet Bank’s partners should go to jail.)

      Ironically the Pictet & Cie .Bank partners are bigger criminals
      than the criminals who have accounts in their bank.

      _ _ _ _
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

      Pictet & Cie Bank.— Partners
      —– ( 1996—2013)—Guilty.

      Peters & Peters — Partners —— (1996 — 2013) —Guilty.

      The bank and it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld crucial
      documents requested under a High Court Order. The bank and it’s
      officials/lawyers deliberately held evidence from the police/courts.

      One of Pictet’s accounts managers SUSAN BROADHEAD gave a false
      witness statement to the police. The banks Head of Alternative Investments
      concocted a letter pretending to be a client and closed his account.

      The senior partner ( IVAN PICTET) sought to have numerous documents
      destroyed along with copies held in their London
      Office’s of Pictet Asset Management. Initially stating that they were
      forgeries.

      Their lawyers PETERS & PETERS —– re MONTY RAPHAEL.Q.C. and
      the barrister CHARLES FLINT. Q.C. later had to admit in Court that the
      documents were indeed genuine.

      British Parliament. Hansard.

      Barry Sheerman .M.P. — quote:

      “ Constituents of mine have lost £2,000,000. through fraud. The
      fraudster used Pictet & Cie – a French Bank – and Pictet Asset Management
      to back the fraud being perpetrated”.

      Both Ivan Pictet and Monty Raphael Q.C. conspired to withhold
      crucial documents requested by the High Court —- the F.S.A —– and the
      Police Fraud Squad.

      Written Parliamentary Questions received by the table office.

      (1) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to ensure
      that Swiss Banks such as Pictet & Cie do not evade criminal prosecution
      under EU law even when the illegal act is committed by a London based
      subsidiary.

      (2) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking mto
      protect the rights of UK citizens
      who seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss banks with subsidiary
      offices located in London.

      – - -
      - – - – - – - – - – - – .

      The consensus of opinion is that Pictet & Cie bank should be
      prosecuted, and that their U.K.
      Banking licence should be taken away.

      Their Solicitors at Peters & Peters.London. – “ Struck off and
      prosecuted.

      In America
      They would have all been in prison for the last seven years.

      Full Story. —– Google or
      Yahoo.

      Ivan Pictet. Banker.

      Charles Pictet. Banker.

      Nicolas Pictet. Banker.

      Renaud de Plant. Banker.

      Francois DeMole. Banker.

      Jacques de Saussure. Banker.

      Philippe Bertherat. Banker.

Latest Press Releases

U.S. Senate Report: Tackle Money Laundering to Curtail Drug Trafficking

Clark Gascoigne · May 20, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC / LONDON – A bipartisan Congressional report published Thursday by the U.S. Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control (Senate Drug ...

Kofi Annan, Africa Progress Panel, Urge G8 & G20 Members to Tackle Illicit Financial Flows to Help Africa

Clark Gascoigne · May 10, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) lauded former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and the Africa Progress Panel (APP), which he chairs, ...

David Cameron Calls for Abolishing Phantom Firms in Major Transparency Victory

Global Financial Integrity · April 25, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC / LONDON – In a major victory for transparency advocates, British Prime Minister David Cameron called on members of the ...