Task Force Blog

Blog

The Isle of Man and Jersey create opacity – according to H M Revenue & Customs

May 27, 2011

By Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy is a founder of the Tax Justice Network and director of Tax Research LLP. An expert on tax policy, he writes a daily blog which provides regular news on his activities and opinions at www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/

A couple of weeks ago I presented evidence to the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee. My evidence will be published shortly. This week Dave Hartnett also gave evidence to that committee, and at least in part on the same subject: employee benefit trusts. As Accountancy Age reports:

[Hartnett] told the Lords Economic Affairs Finance Bill Sub-Committee: “Some of the offshore arrangements have been pretty opaque to us for some time.”

Hartnett said: “It is not always possible to use the exchange of information provisions under treaties and other things to expose those.”

The disclosure regime had done everything it could do “but where you have promoters outside the UK – there are a number of promoters of disguised remuneration schemes in the Isle of Man, in Jersey and in other low tax jurisdictions – the disclosure regime has no bite, and that has been the difficulty”, he said.

So much for the claimed transparency of these places: that’s shown to be a lie, as usual.

And of course the fact that they’re secrecy jurisdictions is confirmed. By my definition secrecy jurisdictions are places that intentionally create regulation for the primary benefit and use of those not resident in their geographical domain. That regulation is designed to undermine the legislation or regulation of another jurisdiction. To facilitate its use secrecy jurisdictions also create a deliberate, legally backed veil of secrecy that ensures that those from outside the jurisdiction making use of its regulation cannot be identified to be doing so. Unambiguously Hartnett is saying that is what the Isle of Man, Jersey and other low tax jurisdictions are.

So, let’s be unambiguous, here we have the head of H M Revenue & Customs saying the Crown Dependencies and others are seeking to undermine the UK tax system.

So let’s have no more claims from such places on their well regulated, open and transparent systems: the blunt fact is they’re being used by some in the financial services sector to undermine the UK tax system and in turn threaten the rule of law and the operation of the democratic mandate in the UK.  That’s what these places are about.

Share

Disclaimer: Unless specifically stated to be the views of the Task Force, the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the individual blogger and are not necessarily those of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development.

Latest Press Releases

GFI’s Tom Cardamone to Testify before Senate Committee Regarding the Global Security Implications of Poaching

Global Financial Integrity · May 23, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) Managing Director Tom Cardamone will testify tomorrow before the full U.S. Senate Committee on ...

FTSE Giants Face Tough Questions on Tax and Financial Secrecy at AGMs This Year

Christian Aid · May 22, 2012

BRUSSELS - Tax is joining high pay as an issue at FTSE100 companies’ AGMs this year, with Boards facing tough questions about ...

GFI Calls on G8 to Tackle Illicit Financial Flows at Camp David Summit

Global Financial Integrity · May 17, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) today called on leaders of the G8 to concretely tackle the issue of illicit financial ...