Task Force Blog

Blog

The IKEA conundrum

October 4, 2010

By Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy is a founder of the Tax Justice Network and director of Tax Research LLP. An expert on tax policy, he writes a daily blog which provides regular news on his activities and opinions at www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/

IKEA is a private company. It does not need to publish an annual financial statement ion the form as a quoted multinational corporation. And it doesn’t. But it has (I think for the first time) published a limited annual report. That’s the good news. The bad news is it does not tell us much.

This is the profit and loss account:

And this is its tax note:

And for the sake of the record, here’s the geographical spread of trading:

So, IKEA makes 79% of its sales in Europe and 62% of its purchases in Europe. It’s  a European dominated business then.

When last I checked the plot of corporate tax rates in the EU was:

To prevent any doubt, a more complex analysis is as follows (all data based on KPMG information, with rates incidentally being largely fixed in 2009):

That’s a lot of data, but you get my point I hope – tax rates may be falling but something around 27% is the norm without weighting for GDP.

And yet IKEA has a tax rate of 13.1% in 2009 and 19.3% in 2008. We have no idea whether these are current rates either: if the provision includes deferred tax the current rate may be lower, but we can’t tell.

All we can wonder is why the published rate IKEA records is so low compared to the rates available in most countries in which IKEA must actually make its profit.Without country-by-country reporting we can’t answer that.

It is, of course, a reason why we need country-by-country reporting. Only when a company reports its sales, costs, profit and tax on a country-by-country reporting basis can be know that it is really paying its way where it should. I’m not saying IKEA isn’t. But I am saying the published data looks hard to reconcile with the rates data noted above, and country-by-country reporting data would let me resolve the conundrum.

I wonder if they’d like to republish on this basis?

Share

Disclaimer: Unless specifically stated to be the views of the Task Force, the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the individual blogger and are not necessarily those of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development.

  • Ikea USA

    Very interesting find. Have you asked ikea to republish it on a country basis?

Latest Press Releases

GFI Calls on G8 to Tackle Illicit Financial Flows at Camp David Summit

Clark Gascoigne · May 17, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) today called on leaders of the G8 to concretely tackle the issue of illicit financial ...

Civil Society, Business Groups Call on Congress to Support Incorporation Transparency, Ban Anonymous U.S. Shell Companies

FACT Coalition · May 16, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, 41 business and civil society groups sent a letter to every member of the U.S. House of Representatives ...

Glencore ‘should explain potentially corrupt deals in Congo’ – Global Witness

Global Witness · May 5, 2012

LONDON - Global Witness is today calling on Glencore to explain potentially corrupt deals in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and is ...