Task Force Blog

Blog

Wicked

August 20, 2009

By Ann Hollingshead

Ann Hollingshead is a Task Force blog contributor, whose posts appear on Wednesdays and Fridays. Formerly a Junior Economist at Global Financial Integrity, Ann is now a Research Analyst for ECONorthwest, an economic consulting firm in the Pacific Northwest. Follow her on Twitter: @AnnHollingshead.

There is an ongoing saga of good versus evil.  Valiant governments, with proud leaders at their helms, are devoted to bringing down the wicked tax havens and the conniving men and women who hide money on their shores.  One day, we will tell the tale of how these governments reigned victorious, dismantled the shadow financial system, and restored the black money to the rightful people of their nations.

If only.

Banking secrecy is no fairy tale.  In the system of international tax evasion, the valiant heroes are just as guilty as the wicked witches.  In a report to the UN, for example, Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz notes the worst offenders are not remote island states, but places like Nevada, Delaware, and London.

In Switzerland, bankers are often fully aware their clients are up to no good, but will vow to take their clients’ names to the grave and then exploit their secrecy laws and sovereignty to do so.  But promises can be broken.  Just this week, for example, Swiss bank UBS has agreed to release the names of 4,450 American clients thought to be sheltering as much as $18 billion from the IRS.   Which is why, if you are a shady bank depositor, it is more appealing to not give your name in the first place.  This is illegal in Switzerland and most tax havens.  It happens to be perfectly legitimate in many American states.

In Delaware, Nevada, and Wyoming, for example, clients can anonymously set up shell corporations (companies that are used exclusively for business transactions and do not have any real assets or operations).  Nevada, one of the worst offenders, does not require banks to even request the names of account or company shareholders, nor do they need to share that information with the federal government.  This means it’s easier to set up a corporation in Nevada than it is to get a library card.  Wicked.

This theory has been proved by Jason Sharman, a professor of political science, who used a small budget and Google to set up shell companies and open anonymous bank accounts in 22 countries – including tax havens and respectable OECD members.  Of his 45 attempts, 17 banks provided him with a shell company without checking his identity.  Four of these were in the U.S.  and seven were in the UK.

In Switzerland and Bermuda, the banks requested a notarized copy of Sharman’s birth certificate.  In Wyoming the professor opened a bank account without so much as a Blockbuster card.  In Great Britain, he formed an anonymous shell company in 45 minutes.  Flat.

This isn’t just about tax evasion. Shell companies are also used for terrorist financing, money laundering, drug trafficking, and to siphon off illicit funds. These entities can absorb, hide and transfer wealth outside the reach of any law enforcement agency.  Shell corporations were also the main tools used by executives at Enron to hide losses and fabricate earnings.  Enron executives, bloated with their own audacity, gave their subsidiaries  snazzy names like “Raptor” and “JEDI”.

The Financial Task Force has proposed that jurisdictions maintain a public list of the beneficial ownership and accounts of companies and trusts. Under this system, banks in Nevada would be required to disclose the information of clients who open corporations and of the persons and entities who are benefiting financially from those accounts.

Well, actually, they need to collect the information first.

Disclaimer: Unless specifically stated to be the views of the Task Force, the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the individual blogger and are not necessarily those of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development.

  • Dev Kar

    Good points. I think once beneficial ownership information are collected and disclosed, the next step would require banks to report these corporations to the IRS much the same way that banks report interest income on individual accounts to the IRS. Shell companies are a corporate tax loophole that needs to be closed without delay.

    Great reading your blog! Keep up the good work.

    Dev

  • Pingback: Tax Research UK » Wicked

  • http://www.kaupthingiom-dag.co.uk Jim

    The Isle of Man government is one of the jurisdictions that presents itself as one of those ‘valiant’ governments upholding what it claims to be a transparent & squeeky-clean offshore financial services industry. But is it really transparent & squeeky clean? Whenever there is a disclosure of any giggerypokery there is a quick retort of pained innocence from the FSC: ‘we didn’t know about it and we are investigating’.

    The Isle of Man has no bank of last resort and no credible depositors’ compensation scheme. Banks are having to rely on their onshore parent banks to offer security of deposits up to £50k.

    On his own admission the Chief of the FSC says that deposits with IoM banks carry the same sort of risks as investments, and prospective depositors need to satisfy themselves that putting their savings in a bank are safe. How do they do that? Kaupthing satisifed depositors that their money was safe but it wasn’t!

    The dispossessed Kaupthing depositors mounting a video campaign on http://www.youtube.com under the banner: DON’T BANK ON THE ISLE OF MAN, in order that others can make informed judgements about just how secure their money would be in the trust of an Isle of Man bank. This website has posted a link to one such video. They are also using Twitter & Facebook to broadcast their message.

    All is revealed here: http://www.kaupthing-dag.co.uk

    Jim
    http://www.ksfiom-blog.blogspot.com

  • http://www.gfip.org Ann Hollingshead

    An example of a country that has effectively implemented beneficial ownership is Austria. For more on how it works, see this article written by Austria’s finance minister:

    http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/a-convenient-hypocrisy-on-tax-havens-/65715.aspx

Latest Press Releases

South Africa Joins the Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development

Task Force · February 10, 2012

WASHINGTON DC – South Africa announced today that it has joined the Partnership Panel of the Task Force on Financial Integrity and ...

Global Witness: Commitments to improved transparency in the forest sector must be acted on

Global Witness · February 9, 2012

LONDON - Forest dependent communities are still in the dark about how their forests are being managed, despite additional commitments from governments ...

U.S. Senate Bill Introduced to Crack Down on Offshore Tax Abuse

Global Financial Integrity · February 7, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) today applauded the introduction of a bill, which would close several major tax loopholes and ...