Task Force Blog

Blog

About those UBS Accounts

June 9, 2009

By Tom Cardamone

Tom Cardamone is the Managing Director of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development. He also serves as the Managing Director of Global Financial Integrity.

A Reuters piece on June 8 reported that many American clients of disgraced Swiss bank UBS are negotiating with the IRS to voluntarally disclose their holdings in order to avoid prosecution on tax evasion charges.  The article noted that a Tampa-based attorney representing some of those clients said, as Reuters put,  “a significant number . . .  under scrutiny by U.S. tax authorities were wealthy Jewish individuals and families, many of them descendants of survivors of the Nazi Holocaust who had set up accounts in Switzerland to protect their assets.”   This raises a couple of questions.

First, how many is a “significant” number?  Does this refer to a percentage of  the attorney’s clients or all Americans with UBS accounts?  It would be interesting to know how prevalent this is since it is brought up quite often as justification for these secret holdings.  There are some 52,000 UBS accounts held by Americans; the bank will not provide information  to the IRS on any of them.   Presumably, only the IRS could estimate with an semblance of accuracy how many accounts had ties back to Nazi Germany .  Unless the IRS makes an estimate, any estimate of holocaust-related accounts is just a guess.

Second, and more importantly, so what?  For the sake of argument let’s say a significant number of those accounts had originated from money being spirited out of Nazi Germany.  That could mean, depending on your definition,  four or four hundred or four thousand accounts were opened during that terrible time in history.  But the war ended in 1945.  At what point does personal responsibility kick in?  In how many generations after the justification for opening the account disappears should it be expected that those accounts are divulged to the IRS?  At what point should it be expected that the owner of the accounts acts in a lawful manner and reports their income on that Swiss account?

The time has long since passed when these accounts should have been brought into the light.

Share

Disclaimer: Unless specifically stated to be the views of the Task Force, the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the individual blogger and are not necessarily those of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development.

Latest Press Releases

Civil Society, Business Groups Call on Congress to Support Incorporation Transparency, Ban Anonymous U.S. Shell Companies

FACT Coalition · May 16, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, 41 business and civil society groups sent a letter to every member of the U.S. House of Representatives ...

Glencore ‘should explain potentially corrupt deals in Congo’ – Global Witness

Global Witness · May 5, 2012

LONDON - Global Witness is today calling on Glencore to explain potentially corrupt deals in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and is ...

Apple Tax Dodging Techniques Emblematic of Problem Costing U.S. $100 Billion, Poor Nations $1 Trillion Annually

Global Financial Integrity · April 30, 2012

WASHIGNTON, DC – A front-page article in Sunday’s edition of The New York Times drew attention to shady accounting techniques utilized by ...